Oh Father, Dear Father
– Raj Kinger
1.
Why is the letter written?
‘Oh Father, Dear Father’ by Raj Kinger is a
heart-wrenching letter addressed to a father by his son. The letter writer
Rahul is the class topper in his school who slips to the second rank for losing
a quarter marks. This letter is his anguished plea to his father who scolds him
for losing his first rank. Rahul is against the India educational system which
is characterized by rote learning without any practical exposure to the real
world. He condemns the emphasis placed on examinations, marks and ranks.
2.
What is the father’s advice to the writer of
the letter?
Rahul
and his father are poles apart. Rahul’s father is a typical
rigid-minded Indian parent who believes in high score. He leads a complicated
and boring life. He earns well, believes in the importance of money and has a
set of rules written for his son. He has a specific approach to life and cannot
expect his son to go against his approach. He has an uncompromising attitude
and has always taught his son to be moulded in the mould of his beliefs. He
often asks his son to think twice before studying and before answering the
papers. He scolds his son for losing his first rank.
Rahul, on the other hand, is intelligent but
loves a simple and natural life. He is inspired by the life style of his
grandparents. Rahul learns from his grandparents that peace of mind and
happiness is the most important things in life. For Rahul, practical education
matters more than theoretical examinations. In his opinion, high scores are of
no use if one is unable to put his theoretical knowledge into practice. Real
education is that which comes handy in our day-today life. For instance it
should teach us how to protect our plants from pests, how to fix a fuse or how
to make your own desk using your carpenter tools.
(Rahul’s
argument against the education system in India is quite convincing. He is
against the Indian educational system which is characterized by rote learning
without any practical exposure to the real world. He condemns the emphasis
placed on examinations, marks and ranks.)
3.
Write brief note on the relationship
between the letter writer and his father?
Rahul
and his father are poles apart. Rahul’s father is a typical
rigid-minded Indian parent who believes in high score. He leads a complicated
and boring life. He earns well, believes in the importance of money and has a
set of rules written for his son. He has a specific approach to life and cannot
expect his son to go against his approach. He has an uncompromising attitude
and has always taught his son to be moulded in the mould of his beliefs. He
often asks his son to think twice before studying and before answering the
papers. He scolds his son for losing his first rank.
Rahul, on the other hand, is intelligent but
loves a simple and natural life. He is inspired by the life style of his
grandparents. Rahul learns from his grandparents that peace of mind and
happiness is the most important things in life. For Rahul, practical education
matters more than theoretical examinations. In his opinion, high scores are of
no use if one is unable to put his theoretical knowledge into practice. Real
education is that which comes handy in our day-today life. For instance it
should teach us how to protect our plants from pests, how to fix a fuse or how
to make your own desk using your carpenter tools.
(Rahul’s
argument against the education system in India is quite convincing. He is
against the Indian educational system which is characterized by rote learning
without any practical exposure to the real world. He condemns the emphasis
placed on examinations, marks and ranks.)
4.
What is the letter writer’s perception
of literacy?
Rahul
and his father are poles apart. Rahul’s father is a typical
rigid-minded Indian parent who believes in high score. He leads a complicated
and boring life. He earns well, believes in the importance of money and has a
set of rules written for his son. He has a specific approach to life and cannot
expect his son to go against his approach. He has an uncompromising attitude
and has always taught his son to be moulded in the mould of his beliefs. He
often asks his son to think twice before studying and before answering the
papers. He scolds his son for losing his first rank.
Rahul, on the other hand, is intelligent but
loves a simple and natural life. He is inspired by the life style of his
grandparents. Rahul learns from his grandparents that peace of mind and
happiness is the most important things in life. For Rahul, practical education
matters more than theoretical examinations. In his opinion, high scores are of
no use if one is unable to put his theoretical knowledge into practice. Real
education is that which comes handy in our day-today life. For instance it
should teach us how to protect our plants from pests, how to fix a fuse or how
to make your own desk using your carpenter tools.
(Rahul’s
argument against the education system in India is quite convincing. He is
against the Indian educational system which is characterized by rote learning
without any practical exposure to the real world. He condemns the emphasis
placed on examinations, marks and ranks.)
5.
How does the letter writer critique the
education system in India? Does he make a convincing argument? Why/ Why not?
Rahul
and his father are poles apart. Rahul’s father is a typical
rigid-minded Indian parent who believes in high score. He leads a complicated
and boring life. He earns well, believes in the importance of money and has a
set of rules written for his son. He has a specific approach to life and cannot
expect his son to go against his approach. He has an uncompromising attitude
and has always taught his son to be moulded in the mould of his beliefs. He
often asks his son to think twice before studying and before answering the
papers. He scolds his son for losing his first rank.
Rahul, on the other hand, is intelligent but
loves a simple and natural life. He is inspired by the life style of his
grandparents. Rahul learns from his grandparents that peace of mind and
happiness is the most important things in life. For Rahul, practical education
matters more than theoretical examinations. In his opinion, high scores are of
no use if one is unable to put his theoretical knowledge into practice. Real
education is that which comes handy in our day-today life. For instance it
should teach us how to protect our plants from pests, how to fix a fuse or how
to make your own desk using your carpenter tools.
Rahul’s
argument against the education system in India is quite convincing. He is
against the Indian educational system which is characterized by rote learning
without any practical exposure to the real world. He condemns the emphasis
placed on examinations, marks and ranks.
6.
How did the letter writer’s teacher react to
his asking her a question?
Rahul
has an unpleasant experience with his Biology teacher. When his
Rose plant is attacked by pests, Rahul seeks advice of his teacher to save his
plant. But the teacher gets irritated as she thinks it a question out of their
syllabus and asks him to approach a gardener for advice. The teacher serves as
a warning to all those teachers who do not show any interest or reverence
towards their profession and mould the students into mere mechanical objects.
7.
What kind of childhood does the letter
writer wish he had?
Rahul
loved the peaceful and happy childhood of his grandparents. Rahul’s
grandfather used to speak of a carefree and beautiful childhood, of
the days when he spent plucking mangoes and guavas from their jameen,
of picnics on the banks of the river where men cooked mouth-watering food
and of playing marbles and gilli danda. During his grandfather’s childhood,
studies were only secondary for our survival. The major subject in their
education was living and experiencing.
Rahul
had always found his grandfather in the right place. He was a man who believed
in simplicity in sharp contrast to Rahul’s father. Rahul asks his father
whether his grandfather was a liar in order to remind him that his
grandfather’s life was the one worth living and not any failure. Seventy years
He refers to the 70 years age of his grandfather and questions his father if
the world has turned upside down during this period. It was during these 70
years that his grandfather had acquired a load of experience which Rahul
considers ideal.
8.
What approach did the letter writer’s
grandfather have towards studies?
Rahul
loved the peaceful and happy childhood of his grandparents. Rahul’s
grandfather used to speak of a carefree and beautiful childhood, of
the days when he spent plucking mangoes and guavas from their jameen,
of picnics on the banks of the river where men cooked mouth-watering food
and of playing marbles and gilli danda. During his grandfather’s childhood,
studies were only secondary for our survival. The major subject in their
education was living and experiencing.
Rahul
had always found his grandfather in the right place. He was a man who believed
in simplicity in sharp contrast to Rahul’s father. Rahul asks his father
whether his grandfather was a liar in order to remind him that his
grandfather’s life was the one worth living and not any failure. Seventy years
He refers to the 70 years age of his grandfather and questions his father if
the world has turned upside down during this period. It was during these 70
years that his grandfather had acquired a load of experience which Rahul
considers ideal.
9.
Describe the letter writer’s
grandparents and their outlooks towards studies and life.
Rahul
loved the peaceful and happy childhood of his grandparents. Rahul’s
grandfather used to speak of a carefree and beautiful childhood, of
the days when he spent plucking mangoes and guavas from their jameen,
of picnics on the banks of the river where men cooked mouth-watering food
and of playing marbles and gilli danda. During his grandfather’s childhood,
studies were only secondary for our survival. The major subject in their
education was living and experiencing.
Rahul
had always found his grandfather in the right place. He was a man who believed
in simplicity in sharp contrast to Rahul’s father. Rahul asks his father
whether his grandfather was a liar in order to remind him that his
grandfather’s life was the one worth living and not any failure. Seventy years
He refers to the 70 years age of his grandfather and questions his father if
the world has turned upside down during this period. It was during these 70
years that his grandfather had acquired a load of experience which Rahul
considers ideal.
10. Why is the letter writer’s grandmother wise?
Rahul’s
grandmother was semi-literate while his mother was highly
qualified. Yet his grandmother lived a happy and contended life and was very
wise. She took delight in cooking, gardening and reading the Gita. Rahul’s
mother, on the other hand, was always tensed and nervous. Rahul questions his
father whether literacy has become a harbinger of restlessness, fear and
frustration.
11. How did the letter writer lose his first rank?
Rahul
expresses a fear that his rigid schooling will deprive him of the joy of
learning. He tells his father that the over emphasis on his studies has taken
away all his enjoyment from his childhood. He says that education does not seem
to make people happy.
Rahul
condemns our educational system and explains the reason for losing his first
rank. It was due to his disagreement with his teacher regarding an answer in
English Grammar. Although the teacher was wrong, he was adamant that he was
correct. Rahul criticizes such an education system which curbs independent
thinking and encourages blind adherence to whatever the teacher teaches.
12. What does the letter writer fear?
Rahul
expresses a fear that his rigid schooling will deprive him of the joy of
learning. He tells his father that the over emphasis on his studies has taken
away all his enjoyment from his childhood. He says that education does not seem
to make people happy.
Rahul
condemns our educational system and explains the reason for losing his first
rank. It was due to his disagreement with his teacher regarding an answer in
English Grammar. Although the teacher was wrong, he was adamant that he was
correct. Rahul criticizes such an education system which curbs independent
thinking and encourages blind adherence to whatever the teacher teaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment